Today we live in a world that exponentially innovating world. – What does that mean? In the old world, a company could “catch a next train” to catch up innovative developments. In the “new” world, that would be impossible. What’s the difference? Gary Hamel explained that already a decade ago… companies are either ‘in’ the innovation or you have to buy a company to be ‘in’. Why? There isn’t going to be another Internet portal momentum we had in the 90’s. You were there, or you were to late. And then you had to BUY to get in. Example is Microsoft buying Hotmail.” source...
Related: digg
“Today we live in a world that exponentially innovating world. – What does that mean? In the old world, a company could “catch a next train” to catch up innovative developments. In the “new” world, that would be impossible. What’s the difference? Gary Hamel explained that already a decade ago… companies are either ‘in’ the innovation or you have to buy a company to be ‘in’. Why? There isn’t going to be another Internet portal momentum we had in the 90’s. You were there, or you were to late. And then you had to BUY to get in. Example is Microsoft buying Hotmail.” source...
Today we live in a world that exponentially innovating world. – What does that mean? In the old world, a company could “catch a next train” to catch up innovative developments. In the “new” world, that would be impossible. What’s the difference? Gary Hamel explained that already a decade ago… companies are either ‘in’ the innovation or you have to buy a company to be ‘in’. Why? There isn’t going to be another Internet portal momentum we had in the 90’s. You were there, or you were to late. And then you had to BUY to get in. Example is Microsoft buying Hotmail.” source...
Loading...